The debate over a 64-team World Cup has crystallized into a tale of two continents, pitting the expansionist ambition of South America against the powerful, conservative influence of Europe. The ultimate rejection of the proposal by FIFA underscores the current balance of power in world football, where European interests often prevail.
The ambition came from Conmebol, the 10-member South American confederation. Their proposal for a 64-team tournament, pitched directly to FIFA President Gianni Infantino, was a bold play to reshape the global landscape in their favor, creating a clear path for all their nations to reach the finals.
However, this ambition ran headlong into the institutional power of Europe. UEFA, led by its influential president Aleksander Ceferin, was the most vocal and powerful opponent of the plan. Ceferin’s branding of the proposal as a “bad idea” set the tone for the global debate and galvanized opposition. His concerns about quality and the integrity of qualifying competitions are widely shared among Europe’s top football nations.
An inside source at FIFA confirmed that the opposition within the council was “not just in Europe,” but the continent’s unified and powerful voice was undoubtedly a decisive factor. As a FIFA vice-president, Ceferin’s stance carries immense weight, and his ability to rally support for his position proved critical.
While the decision was a collective one, the outcome is a clear reflection of the current geopolitical landscape of football. South America’s dream of a bigger World Cup was ultimately checked by the powerful voting bloc and ideological influence of Europe, which remains the dominant force in the global game.
A Tale of Two Continents: South America’s Ambition Clashes with European Power
